The specific moral issues involved will vary from case to case. Identify the parties involved. If you discover, for example, that a supervisor is pushing his subordinates to sell defective goods rather than lose money by destroying them, then salespeople, bosses, customers, and the company's owners would all be affected if this comes to light. List potential solutions and the possible consequences if you act on them.
In the defective goods case, for example, you could report the supervisor to upper management, offer the salespeople your support if they refuse his orders, report what's going on to a regulatory agency or the media, do nothing, or find a job elsewhere.
Each decision will have different consequences. Pick the most ethical action to follow. The University of Nevada recommends you judge which action will generate the most good for the most people or which is most likely to fix the problem. Arguing this position will also involve presenting counterarguments and then refuting them.
Finally, ensuring that your reasoning is valid and sound and citing the appropriate sources will allow you to write an ethics paper that will satisfy any critic.
Make sure that you understand the assignment. Before you begin your ethics paper, take some time to read through the assignment guidelines, ask questions about the assignment, and think through what you need to do in this paper. Get answers to some questions before you start on the assignment. What specific things do you need to do in order to get a good grade? How much time will you need to complete the assignment? Choose a topic for your ethics paper.
If you're writing the paper as a class assignment, the topic may already be given to you. If not, choose a topic that is both interesting to you and that you know a good deal about. Your topic should be very broad at first, after which you can develop it into a specific inquiry. Narrow down your topic. After you have selected a topic, you will want to narrow your topic down to a more specific issue. This is perfectly acceptable, and is part of the advantage of writing a paper in multiple drafts.
Outline the relevant issues to your topic. Once you have decided on a specific topic, make a list of all the specific issues that could be used to argue for or against positions within that topic. This list does not have to be ordered in any specific way. For example, you might imagine yourself taking the position that euthanasia is acceptable in this circumstance, and you could order the issues based on how you would draw supporting evidence and build your claim. Draft your thesis statement.
The thesis is the central position you will be arguing in your ethics paper, but keep in mind that your thesis may change as you continue to work on your ethics paper. Write out a tentative temporary or changeable thesis statement and use it to help focus your argument and write your paper. For example, you might write your thesis as follows: Remove ambiguous language to clarify your exact position. These words may affect the clarity of your thesis statement so try not to use these words in your thesis statement.
Clarify your position to create a strong thesis: Make sure the focus of your thesis aligns with your intended focus for the paper. The focus of your paper will depend on the wording of your thesis, so it is crucial to make sure your thesis is worded how you want it to be. Otherwise, you may end up confusing your readers.
The author of this thesis would need to make sure to focus on the patient in the essay and not to focus on the moral implications of the doctor's actions. If the thesis you have written does not reflect what you want to argue in your paper, start over and draft a new thesis statement. Select sources to research before writing your ethics paper.
To strengthen your argument for a certain ethical position, you will need to cite reputable sources in your paper. University and public libraries provide the best place to obtain material to research and cite. A simple way to strengthen your argument through citations is by incorporating some relevant statistics.
Simple statistics can have a major impact if presented after you've made a bold assertion. For instance, you may claim that the patient's family members would be unduly traumatized if the patient chose euthanasia, and then cite a university study that catalogued a majority of families reporting trauma or stress in this situation.
Another helpful citation is one in which the broad issue itself is discussed. For instance, you might cite a prominent ethicist's position on your issue to strengthen your position. Some things to consider when trying to determine if a source is trustworthy include: Steer clear of sources without an author attached to them or that lack credentials when credentials seem crucial, such as in an article about a medical subject.
Is the publication a book, journal, magazine, or website? Is the publisher an academic or educational institution? Does the publisher have a motive other than education? According to the revision of the American Nurses Association Code for Nurses, there are four provisions that pertain to this situation. The main provision is Provision 1. Nurses actively participate in assessing and assuring the responsible and appropriate interventions in order to minimize unwarranted or unwanted treatment and patient suffering.
The acceptability and importance of carefully considered decisions regarding resuscitation status, withholding and withdrawing life sustaining therapies, forgoing medically provided nutrition and hydration, aggressive pain management and advance directives are increasingly evident. The nurses should provide interventions to relieve pain and other symptoms in the dying patient even when those interventions entail risks of hastening death.
However, nurses may not act with the sole intent of ending a patient's life though such actions may be motivated by compassion, respect for patient autonomy, and quality of life considerations.
Nurses have invaluable experience, knowledge, and insight into care at the end of life and should be actively involved in related research, education, practice, and policy development. According to this provision, as well as provisions: These issues are all of ethical concerns, but are also legal concern according to the fact that is illegal to not completely attempt resuscitative efforts in the absence of a DNR. The ethical principles involved in the care of this patient include beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and paternalism.
Beneficence states that "the actions one takes should promote good. Page 1 of 9.
Free ethical analysis papers, essays, and research papers.
Free Essay: Running Head: Ethical Analysis Paper When Patient Care Conflicts with Moral, Ethical, and Legal Boundaries Ethical Analysis Paper NURS
Ethical Case Analysis Paper I heard about this woman from a friend who works for Social Services in Erie County. She is a 28 year old white woman. She is a drug addict and has never received rehabilitation. She does not have a job. She lives in rental unit paid for by public assistance. He told me that she has lived in poverty since childhood. Aristotle-Ethical Analysis paper Paper instructions: The model format is MEMORANDUM. 1. Describe the work of ARISTOTLE. cliffdockery6ovpcj6.gabe the major ethical that he developed 3. Identify nursing and Health Care practices that this theory supports 4. Identify Nursing and Health care practices that may contradict this theory 5. Identify at .
Running Head: Ethical Analysis Paper When Patient Care Conflicts with Moral, Ethical, and Legal Boundaries Ethical Analysis Paper NURS Trends and Issues4/4(1). Oct 20, · An Ethical Analysis of Kardell Paper Company Decision Executive Summery The Board of directors of Kardell Paper Company should accept the installation of the new processing technology witch protects the environment by refining the company's waste cliffdockery6ovpcj6.gaenting this new technology will increase the company's .