We should take measures in order to reduce the amount of guns people possess, otherwise it may lead to a great number of tragedies. Rage, jealousy and anger are strong motifs and before you know it, somebody has already hurt the other person.
The government should be very careful deciding whether this person should or should not be allowed to carry a gun. Our reality is harsh and what seemed to be a measure of protection may turn into brutality.
All in all, the topic is quite complex and requires a lot of thinking. There have been arguments regarding the gun control in the United States where some people have been on the idea that laws on gun control should be enhanced while others supported the idea that they should be scrapped and there should no be rules governing gun control in the country. The importance on gun control rules was emphasized due to the increase in insecurity whose main attribute is gun violence raised by the people who are in possession of the guns.
The second amendment allows citizens to have the right to bear arms and can use them for self defense. Therefore, when there are fights against people possessing firearms, it is an indication that people are trying to defeat the point that gave birth to the second amendment. There has also been an argument that violence will also be experienced in the absence of the guns. There are other weapons that can be used to perpetrate violence, and other factors should be considered in controlling violence apart from confiscating guns and bringing other laws that control gun possession.
For instance, there was reported a case where a young man stabbed his fellow student with a screwdriver in a high school. He did not need a gun to commit the murder, yet there was crime in the school. People are also denied freedom of some activities such as hunting. For many people, hunting is a hobby, and a gun is used in hunting the wild animals.
When there are gun control laws, it is very obvious that they are deprived of their interest in their hobby. For these reasons, there should no be gun control laws, as people should be allowed to use the guns at their discretion Dixon, Most Americans cling to the second amendment that allows citizens to hold firearms wherever they go for their own safety. Most people also believe that the second amendment was placed so that the citizens would be protected from the tyrannical government that seemed to keep people in fear.
People would have the power to rebel in case the government introduced dictatorial policies for their people. However, though this was not the main aim why people were issued with guns, it served as a purpose as the power of the government would be regulated in a way that the people would be given a chance to make their own ideas and also be given a voice in the government.
This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means. The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army. It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army.
The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention. This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed.
Blackman Aug Just like the first bill the second bill really does nothing to deter crime. The bills really just keep the honest people honest. If they really want to deter crime they should allow people the right to conceal and carry their own firearm. Most pro-gun control people want you to believe that, the police are there to protect you. The police are not personal bodyguards.
The police there as a general deterrent to crime, they usually act after the crime as occurred. Many court cases have stated that the police have no obligation to protect you.
You cannot sue them for failure to protect you. Most criminals will usually not know if one person is carrying a gun, but if several civilians start carrying a gun the criminals will become warier. Blackman did a study of 1, imprisoned felons. Eighty-eight percent of the criminals agreed that gun laws only effect law abiding citizens. Fifty-six percent of the criminals agreed that they are not going to mess around with an armed.
Seventy-four percent agreed that the one reason they avoid homes were people are there is because they are afraid of being shot. Forty percent also said that they did not commit a crime because they were afraid the victim was armed. The State of Florida was one of first states to allow conceal and carry laws. The law required that the applicant be at least 21 years of age, no criminal record, no record of drug and alcohol abuse, no history of mental illness, and complete a firearms safety course by the NRA.
The permit must be renewed every three years. The permit is good throughout the, entire state. These and some other court cases have largely contributed to today's understanding of individual possession and gun control, so being familiar with them is also necessary for building your expertise on gun control.
Getting familiar with the historical background of the gun control discussion is only half of your research. You will also need to be aware of the present-day state of this ongoing discussion. To make it easier for you, we have taken the liberty and put together a selection of insightful pieces from both sides of the gun control discussion.
These pro gun control articles state that the current gun control regulations are not effective enough to confront gun violence and talk about how the situation can be improved:. Since everybody talks about gun control today, Amanda Marcotte of the Rolling Stone magazine has also come up with this surprisingly insightful piece. She does not claim to be an expert but rather speaks from the stand of one of the people at whom pro-gun arguments are supposed to aim, and explains why they don't work.
If you feel like you are not well-informed enough about gun control, this article is priceless for you. It briefly sums up the spirit of the Second Amendment as it was years ago and follows its evolution through the years, as well as the evolution of firearms themselves.
This article is a detailed overview of the present-day gun control regulations in California, which is arguably the strictest in the land. They conclude by stating that the current regulations are not effective enough, as they involve a number of loopholes. The authors suggest that the regulations should be made even stricter.
Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment? Barrett points out that the language in the text of the Second Amendment is quite vague and leaves too much room for interpretation. So, instead of fixing or clarifying it, he suggests that a whole newest of regulations is necessary, clear and direct. Bovy takes a more radical stand in this discussion. She claims that we need to get rid of individual gun possession as a whole, with no exceptions. In his time, Hamblin was fired for drafting a piece on gun control that was not approved by his superiors.
In this article, he talks about how unhealthily politicized the topic is and how our society is incapable of seeing it as it is and not as an attack on our whole set of rights and freedoms.
These anti gun control articles insist that the existing gun control regulations are ineffective because they are too strict and suggest that these regulations need to be loosened. Here is what the experts from this side of the argument have to say:.
DePhilippis and Hughes are convinced that the opinion that stricter gun regulations can end gun violence is wrong and that it is a myth that needs to be debunked. If you want to read more from them, feel free to check out their gun violence prevention site Armed With Reason.
Davidson takes a scholarly approach on the issue. He attempts to give a definition of gun control and critically scrutinize the most common gun control approaches and methods. This emotional piece is written by the widow of Chris Kyle whose tragic story was put on screen in American Sniper. If you want to know more about her take on gun control policy, you can read about it on her book American Wife: As a recognized author of books on crime and a respected teacher at Pepperdine University, Wilson uses his expertise to analyze what exactly pro gun control side has to offer.
He concludes that they are being too populist and have no concrete plan of action. Hunter works of Rand Paul, the conservative senator. The article focuses on stories where gun-owning individuals helped to confront crime and violence, as opposed to the stories where such individuals cause violence — that the pro gun control lobbyists like to manipulate.
Hardy is a practicing attorney from Arizona. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue. According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good.
Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle. You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write:.
Since gun control is an extremely debatable topic, it is most exciting to talk about which side of the debate is right. This is why, students most often have to write either argumentative or persuasive essays on gun control. If you have to write a persuasive essay, you know what you should do first — pick a topic that can inspire a debate between at least two opposing sides.
You also need a compelling argument that you will defend. Here, you also have nothing to worry about, because both sides of the gun control debate have numerous compelling arguments. As soon as the latter two elements are in place, it is the high time to start your research.
Putting it briefly, first, you get yourself familiar with the relevant historical background of the issue, and then you collect expert opinions.
Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control.
Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people. When you’re writing an argumentative essay, it generally doesn’t matter what side of an issue you take. What matters is.
Expository gun control essay. In an expository essay, you simply list everything there is to know about the subject without expressing any opinion, i.e., you expose the subject. You can write about the current gun control regulations or talk about which ideas on gun control prevail today. Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of.
Free gun control papers, essays, and research papers. My Account. Your search returned over there are also the people who disagree with gun control laws and believe there should be a more lenient gun control to furthermore help people defend themselves during risky situations. Many gun control laws have been passed for many years. While. Gun Control Essay Do we really need gun control? America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages.